The
World Trade Organization (WTO) which replace the General Agreement of Trade and
Transfer (GATT), has came into effect from 1st January, 1995 with
the hacking of at least 85 founding members country. The WTO now comes at the
third economic pillar of worldwide dimension along with the World Bank and
International Monetary Fund (IMF). The new trade body-WTO with power to settle
trade disputes between nations and to widen the principle of free trade to
sectors such service and agriculture covers more areas than GATT. The WTO
envisages the reduction of tariffs by more than one third and is concerned with
further opening of markets.
WTO
is an organization that has put forward the concept of removing non-tariff
barriers for free trade of goods and services within the member countries. This
means no country which is the member of World Trade Organization can impose
non-tariff restrictions against imports from any other country which is also
the member of WTO. Non tariff barriers include imposing trade embargo,
restriction imports under quota and other forms on non-tax restriction. The
establishment of WTO has helped fade the conventional approach of promoting the
concept of import substitution and self dependency. The policy now is open
liberal and outward looking and based on export promotion. The export promotion
however, does not necessarily mean advocating protectionism policy and safeguarding
domestic industries. It refers to enhancing competitive strength of industries
with least comparative cost. The most important principles built into the
foundation of multilateral trading system such as WTO are: Trade without
Discrimination Freer Trade, and Predictability.
The WTO Agreements
The
WTO's agreements are the result of negotiations between the members. GATT is
the WTO's principal rule-book for trade in goods. A new rule has been created
to deal with trade in services, relevant aspects of intellectual properly,
dispute settlement, and trade policy reviews. Through these agreements, WTO
members operate a non-discriminatory trading system that spells out their
rights and their obligations. Each country receives guarantees that its exports
will be treated fairly and consistently in other countries' markets. Each
promises to do the same for imports into its own market. The system also gives
developing countries some flexibility in implementing their commitments.
Nepal and WTO
Nepal
applied for membership of GATT in 1989 as necessitated by its geopolitical
feature. GATT membership was an essential for Nepal to protect its transit
right under GATT articles V especially in cases, when countries arises with the
neighboring countries pertaining to trade and transit rights. Nepal did not
take any initiatives to acquire membership prior to 1990's. It remained only
observer of the GATT. During 1990s the
process of liberalization gained momentum and in 1997 Nepal applied for
membership of WTO, an organization for rule based free trade.
Some
civil society organizations, including South Asia Watch on Trade, Economics and
Environment (SAWTEE), were strongly in favor of Nepal's WTO membership. They
are proponents of in the multilateral trading system and took the view that
Nepal would gain from it. They were more interested in building the strength
and skills in negotiating team. The fifth Ministerial Conference of WTO held in
Cancun in September 2003 approved Nepal's accession to the WTO and offered
membership, subject to ratification by the government. Nepal was required to
ratify the protocol of accession by 31st March 2004, as per the
terms of its accession.
On
23rd April 2004, Nepal has formally been inducted in the WTO as its
147th member. For an economy, which had already started economic
liberalization program as early 1992, WTO accession does not come as a
surprise. This is so because Nepal had initially applied for membership to the
multilateral trading system in 1989.
Nepal
membership in WTO presents a wide spectrum of challenges along with the
opportunities. The current challenges are in the form of having a transparent
set of legal framework that is consistent with WTO and the opportunities of
having a stable trading environment that can accelerate domestic economic
growth and development.
Opportunities of WTO Membership
WTO
membership will confer equal level of new trading operations for all member
countries. Benefit don not drive automatically but it depends on the ability to
identify and take advantage of trading opportunities, fulfilled multilateral
trading obligation, pursue and formulate development strategies, within the
frame work of those obligation and above all depend in its economic finance and
trade need.
Neither
WTO membership will drastically change Nepalese present grim agricultural
performance nor make Nepalese export highly competitive and profitable in the
international markets. In fact WTO membership will confer greater export
opportunities to Nepal, which greater challenges ahead to take advantages of
new trading opportunities conferred by WTO membership.
Since
Nepal is not a major player in the global trade, it will unrealistic to expect
maximum gain from the WTO membership within existing countries economic status,
agriculture performance, export performance and resource based. To gain maximum
benefit conferred by WTO membership, Nepal has to formulate and conduct sound
agriculture policies and strategies within frame work of WTO obligation, which
will be capable of transforming present grim agricultural performances. It is
therefore not a panacea. Integration with the global economy is necessary but
not a sufficient condition for growth. WTO offers rights but with them some
obligations. It provides opportunities but also some challenge. The specific
potential benefits for Nepal after accession to WTO can be seen on the
following grounds:
Country
Status
As
per WTO provision LDCs are exempted from reduction commitments i.e. tariff
rates, export subsidies, domestic support. Nepal being a least developed
country will secure important exemption from tariff reduction, elimination and
reduction of subsidies and other supports to agriculture (because this facility
is not provided to developing countries) which will indeed improve Nepal's
competitive edges in the markets of neighboring countries.
Protection
of Dumping
In
the past, both developed and developing countries dumped their surplus
agricultural commodities in the global markets at the subsidized price. The
main aim of this policy was to eliminate competition and thereby gained
monopoly in the global market. In 1993, Nepal could not export lentil to Sir
Lanka because of subsidized lentil export from Turkey. UR agreement will
definitely eliminate this type of unfair competition in the future. The
developing countries will have to reduce the volume of export subsidies by 21
percent and the quantity of subsidized export by 14 percent over a ten year
period but developed countries have to reduce volume of export subsidies by 36
percent and the quantity of subsidized export by 21 percent over a six year
period. Hence this provision under WTO will improve Nepal's competitive edge in
the global market.
Increase
in Food Grain Price
To
correct failure in the agriculture sector, the then government formulated the
20-year agricultural perspective plan and has clearly emphasized the production
of food grains. The reduction in production subsidies in the major grain
producing countries is likely to lead to increase world grain price (FAO,
1995). At present Nepal is a marginal food importing country. If present trend
continues, food grain imports will become increasingly important, and Nepal
will face a growing import bill, due to a rising volume of imports and expected
global price increase increases (Gill, 1996). But if the targets of APP are
achieved in the future, then Nepal will turn from food importing country in
food exporting country by the year 2014/15. Thus Nepal could become the
beneficiary of rising world price. With low tariff rate and removal of
non-tariff barriers by neighbor countries will make Nepalese agricultural
countries much more competitive in their markets and it will definitely
stimulate Nepalese farmers to produce more.
End
of Preferential Trading Arrangement
Nepal
has never gained any preferential access of its agricultural products.
According to new GATT rule, MFN must be granted to all member countries without
discrimination. Dismantling to the preferential trading arrangement will open
up new markets for Nepal in the future.
Export
Subsidies
Under
WTO provisions, Nepal could provide export subsidies. Since Nepal is one of the
list developed countries in the world, cannot afford to provide export
subsidies at a significant level, but can target particular products for
particular market and subsidies some of the starts of the costs.
Dismantling
of Non Tariff Barriers
Under
UR agreement, all non tariff barriers are to be dismantled and converted into
ordinary tariff and reduced in a given time boundary by developed and
developing countries. This will open new market opportunities for LDCs. Nepal
will gain new markets access in the both developed and developing countries
markets.
Tariff
Binding
Under
WTO provision, member countries could declare their own tariff policy stating
that it would not raise tariff rates beyond a creation percentage. Nepal could bind
its high import tariff rates. Nepal being LDC would not require undertaking the
reduction commitment. Nepalese framers could be protected, binding high import
tariff rate, so that they could compete in the domestic market with more
efficient overseas producers.
Access
of Market
As
per WTO provision a minimum access level has to be established for domestic
consumption and has to be increased to 5 percent of domestic consumption over 6
year period. Under this provision all the member countries will be obliged to
import the agricultural products, from agro exporting countries. Nepal will
have market access not only in neighboring countries but also in overseas
countries by the establishment of minimum access opportunities under WTO rules.
Rise
in the Government Revenue
Lowering
export and import tariff will expand trade and converting quantitative
restriction into trade tax will increase the government revenue. Lower the tax
rate, the greater will be volume of trade, result will be an increase in the
government revenue. Simplification in the tariff structure would reduce
administration cost and reduce corruption, smuggling and domestic price
distortion and thereby increase the efficiency of resource use within the
import completion and export sectors.
Impact
in the LDCs and Developing Countries by SPS
Under
the SPS agreement, countries must be based on international standard,
guidelines or recommendation, where these exist, except as otherwise provided
for in the SPS agreement. Thus transparency and science base standards are
encouraged and the SPS major can be applied in a non-discriminatory manner
(UNCTAD, 1998), these measure lead to increase high cost of production in the
LDCs due to lack of skills in meeting such standard. WTO provision encourages
development countries to provide technical and other assistance to LDCs like
Nepal to meet SPs standards.
High
value Agriculture Commodities Export
Traditionally
Nepalese agriculture export constitutes bulk of lower commodities. But in
recent year, the trade of Nepalese agriculture export has been more diversified
and as a result, the export of pulse hides and skins, higher seed, tea and
essential oil have come to prominence. Besides these traditional agriculture
export items, some new export potential has emerged in the field of citrus,
some new export potential has emerged in the field of citrus, apples, silk,
honey, floriculture, vegetables seed, horticultures, angora rabbit wool and yak cheese. WTO membership wills center
potential access in the world market for these products.
Other
important opportunity of WTO member can be summarized as below:
-
International
business competition will entrance the capacity and productivity of Nepalese
Industries.
-
Benefit from the
provision of positive discrimination of LDCs preferences.
-
Import
consistency for industrial inputs.
-
Possible
assistance from WTO secretarial and trading partners for domestic capacity
enhancement.
-
Well define
trade will be institutionalized and there will be no frequent transit related
tussles with India as used to be experienced in the past.
-
Safeguard from
unilateral decision to trading partners.
-
Benefit linkage
with transitional will be improved and it will improve production and
employment.
-
Helps to
increase Foreign Direct Investment (FDI).
-
Helps to
eradicate the problem arising from the bilateral business with the neighboring
countries.
Challenges
of WTO Membership
A major pressing policy in Nepal is less the
establishment of new industries than of enhancing the competitiveness of
existing inefficient and technological stagnant industries. Industrial reform
and restructuring need, thus to address various determinants of capability
development: the incentive framework, the supply of human capital, the
supporting technology infrastructure, finance for technological activity, and
access to foreign technology. Coping with increased global market
competitiveness also presents a great policy challenge to country, and how it
responds to it will be crucial in its success in regional and global
integration strategies.
Despite Nepal being an agrarian economy, its
share in export is minuscule. The foremost challenge to the Nepalese economy
is, therefore, non about what would be the impact of the agreement on
agriculture, but about how to boost the farm output and institutionalize the
sector in order to cash in on the opportunities of the market liberalization.
The present stage of financial sector
development in Nepal indicates that full liberalization of the financial
services sector is not possible in the near future. This is especially true
since the inappropriate liberalization of financial services sector affects the
exiting policy on capital account. Challenges of WTO membership can be explain
as follows.
Employment
At
present, 14 percent of the Nepalese workforce is believed to be unemployed and
47 percent underemployed. To achieve a higher level of production, in terms of
both quality and quantity, sophisticated machineries and better technology have
to raise production efficiency. It is machinery rather than labor that allows
to achieve the target of meeting the market demand on schedule .Therefore it is
very likely that the workforce is replaced instantly by machineries like in
developed economies.
Negotiation for More Benefits
The
task of negotiation for accession with the objective of gaining more and
loosing less is challenging for Nepal primarily due to lack of knowledgeable
and skillful human resources with the government as well as private sector.
Strengthening Institutions
Given
the financial constraint of the government and the lack of proper policy
intervention to cope with the responsibility and obligations posed by the WTO
membership, the task of strengthening institutions seems difficult to achieve.
Specialization in Some Products and Services
This
is a challenging task of Nepal, when there is lack of proper physical and
institutional infrastructure, capital and resources for industrialization.
Making Industries Cost Effective
The
old industries of Nepal need urgent restructuring and modernization in order to
make them capable of producing quality goods at a competitive price. It is not
possible to make industries cost effective without investment.
Income Distribution and Poverty
Since
rules, laws, practices and norms of economic and social nature are shaped as
per the requirements of the global village, the economy and society are put
under the powerful influence of outside forces, such as INGOs and MNCs. Local
monopolies are also replaced by international monopolist whose interest is not
to co-operate with local government in resolving any social crisis but to reap
economic benefits. The process aggravates the problems of income and wealth
inequality, the rural-urban gap, poverty, unemployment and social and economic
dualism. The country is thus forced to remain in a low equilibrium poverty
trap.
Monopoly of MNCs in Patent
Due
to the intervention of MNCs in local initiatives, due to huge research
capacities and technological advancement, MNCs are able to patent other
countries resources especially LDCs like Nepal Basmati rice which is originated
in South Asia, was patented by one of the U.S.MNCS under the name of
‘Taxomati’. Similarly, ‘turmeric’ and ‘neem’ was also being patented in the
U.S. recently a patent has been granted to a U.S. firm on Karela (bitter
gourd), Jamun (Sygimium cumini) and brinzal for anti-diabetic properties
despite their use being mentioned in several Indian texts.
Other
important challenges of WTO membership can be summarized as below:
-
Even if WTO is rule based trading system, it is
still power based in some extent since they offer bilateral deals.
-
Nepal can get advantage only after a long period
due to various issues like as manpower, technology, resources etc.
-
Eventually phase out of quota system MFA
agreement supposed to reduce export and eventfully creates some threat on
Balance of Payment (BOP).
-
WTO extends the ends of Development Countries to
Least Developed Countries.
-
Problems
for granted farmers.
-
Enhancing competitive capacity is difficult.
-
Threats to domestic products by imports.
-
The economy will move vulnerable to external
sector.
-
Displacement possible for non competitive goods
and services.
-
Various existing legal provision, administrative
system and process and institutional management and needed to be changed
according to the commitment with the WTO strategy in the designed time
schedule.
-
Administrative change, political instability and
irregularity in rules and regulation.
Critical
Analysis
It
is argued that the market access opportunities provided by WTO system can lead
to further investment addressing the constraint of limited domestic market for
economic scale of productive operation, which also helps to raise investment,
economic production of goods and services and industrialization process.
Theoretically, WTO membership secured extended market opportunities in member
countries without discrimination to Nepal’s exports. Analysis of pre and post
accession period export data given below may present a glimpse of market access
benefits to Nepal (or to what extent Nepal have been successful in realizing
those market access benefits in Nepal’s favor).
No comments:
Post a Comment